ERC-20 vs ERC-3135

Token Standard compared with Exclusive Claimable Token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 7 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-3135 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x2ada8a32`	`claim(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xb6b55f25`	`deposit(uint256)`
`0xfba13bd0`	`depositBalanceOf(address)`
`0x1b0c1a62`	`iconUrl()`
`0x1d143848`	`issuer()`
`0x6849cb9d`	`transferIssuer(address)`
`0xf3fef3a3`	`withdraw(address,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-3135