ERC-20 vs ERC-1996

Token Standard compared with Holdable Token.

No shared functions

0 shared · 9 vs 12 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-1996 lists ERC-20 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`

`0x7649c6d1`	`authorizeHoldOperator(address)`
`0xc5a468c6`	`balanceOnHold(address)`
`0xda7d3d04`	`executeHold(string,uint256)`
`0x78404999`	`hold(string,address,address,uint256,uint256)`
`0xc5b670f0`	`holdFrom(string,address,address,address,uint256,uint256)`
`0xc2ac5b5c`	`isHoldOperatorFor(address,address)`
`0x0b986a50`	`netBalanceOf(address)`
`0x8e4a5a92`	`releaseHold(string)`
`0xec38b229`	`renewHold(string,uint256)`
`0x4cb0267f`	`retrieveHoldData(string)`
`0x36c8773f`	`revokeHoldOperator(address)`
`0x51bfb961`	`totalSupplyOnHold()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-20 · ERC-1996