ERC-173 vs ERC-7621
Contract Ownership Standard compared with Basket Token.
No shared functions
0 shared · 3 vs 11 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-7621 lists ERC-173 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-173 (3)
0x8da5cb5b | owner() |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0xf2fde38b | transferOwnership(address) |
▶️ Only in ERC-7621 (11)
0xa1ee8feb | contribute(uint256[],address,uint256) |
0x10d79f4d | getConstituents() |
0xc9a396e9 | getReserve(address) |
0xac6c5251 | getWeight(address) |
0x6a76d37b | isConstituent(address) |
0xd1602deb | previewContribute(uint256[]) |
0x0a28a477 | previewWithdraw(uint256) |
0x2be01190 | rebalance(address[],uint256[]) |
0x28b50621 | totalBasketValue() |
0x1f39b64e | totalConstituents() |
0xb06c2075 | withdraw(uint256,address,uint256[]) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-173 · ERC-7621