ERC-173 vs ERC-725
Contract Ownership Standard compared with General data key/value store and execution.
No shared functions
0 shared · 3 vs 7 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-725 lists ERC-173 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-173 (3)
0x8da5cb5b | owner() |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0xf2fde38b | transferOwnership(address) |
▶️ Only in ERC-725 (7)
0x44c028fe | execute(uint256,address,uint256,bytes) |
0x6c31b526 | executeBatch(uint256[],address[],uint256[],bytes) |
0x31858452 | executeBatch(uint256[],address[],uint256[],bytes[]) |
0x54f6127f | getData(bytes32) |
0xdedff9c6 | getDataBatch(bytes32[]) |
0x7f23690c | setData(bytes32,bytes) |
0x97902421 | setDataBatch(bytes32[],bytes[]) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-173 · ERC-725