ERC-173 vs ERC-3643

Contract Ownership Standard compared with T-REX - Token for Regulated EXchanges.

No shared functions

0 shared · 3 vs 37 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-3643 lists ERC-173 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0xdd62ed3e`	`allowance(address,address)`
`0x095ea7b3`	`approve(address,uint256)`
`0x70a08231`	`balanceOf(address)`
`0x4a6cc677`	`batchBurn(address[],uint256[])`
`0x42a47abc`	`batchForcedTransfer(address[],address[],uint256[])`
`0xfc7e5fa8`	`batchFreezePartialTokens(address[],uint256[])`
`0x68573107`	`batchMint(address[],uint256[])`
`0x1a7af379`	`batchSetAddressFrozen(address[],bool[])`
`0x88d695b2`	`batchTransfer(address[],uint256[])`
`0x4710362d`	`batchUnfreezePartialTokens(address[],uint256[])`
`0x9dc29fac`	`burn(address,uint256)`
`0x6290865d`	`compliance()`
`0x313ce567`	`decimals()`
`0x9fc1d0e7`	`forcedTransfer(address,address,uint256)`
`0x125c4a33`	`freezePartialTokens(address,uint256)`
`0x158b1a57`	`getFrozenTokens(address)`
`0x134e18f4`	`identityRegistry()`
`0xe5839836`	`isFrozen(address)`
`0x40c10f19`	`mint(address,uint256)`
`0x06fdde03`	`name()`
`0xaba63705`	`onchainID()`
`0x8456cb59`	`pause()`
`0x5c975abb`	`paused()`
`0x9285948a`	`recoveryAddress(address,address,address)`
`0xc69c09cf`	`setAddressFrozen(address,bool)`
`0xf8981789`	`setCompliance(address)`
`0xcbf3f861`	`setIdentityRegistry(address)`
`0xc47f0027`	`setName(string)`
`0x3d1ddc5b`	`setOnchainID(address)`
`0xb84c8246`	`setSymbol(string)`
`0x95d89b41`	`symbol()`
`0x18160ddd`	`totalSupply()`
`0xa9059cbb`	`transfer(address,uint256)`
`0x23b872dd`	`transferFrom(address,address,uint256)`
`0x1fe56f7d`	`unfreezePartialTokens(address,uint256)`
`0x3f4ba83a`	`unpause()`
`0x54fd4d50`	`version()`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-173 · ERC-3643