ERC-165 vs ERC-8329

Standard Interface Detection compared with Subject-Linked Impact Snapshot Log.

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 13 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8329 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

`0x14b679e1`	`activeMethodology(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0x9deab8e4`	`attestationCount(bytes32,uint256)`
`0xede1ef89`	`attestSnapshot(bytes32,uint256,bool,bytes32,string)`
`0x32f2212e`	`currentSnapshotForPeriod(bytes32,bytes32,uint64,uint64)`
`0xeac3b277`	`getAttestation(bytes32,uint256,uint256)`
`0x3df3ce14`	`getSnapshot(bytes32,uint256)`
`0x444061d4`	`indicatorSnapshotAt(bytes32,bytes32,uint256)`
`0x4c1d2201`	`indicatorSnapshotCount(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0x75793efd`	`latestIndicatorSnapshot(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0x2e68488d`	`pendingMethodology(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0xec171469`	`recordSnapshot(bytes32,bytes32,int256,uint8,bytes32,uint64,uint64,bytes32,string,uint256)`
`0x52c6a722`	`snapshotCount(bytes32)`
`0x46e2fc33`	`supersedeMethodology(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,string,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-8329