ERC-165 vs ERC-8328
Standard Interface Detection compared with Subject-Linked Compliance Event Log.
No shared functions
0 shared · 1 vs 8 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-8328 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-165 (1)
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
▶️ Only in ERC-8328 (8)
0x648c3b52 | currentEventIndex(bytes32,uint256) |
0x2d1069b4 | eventByTypeAt(bytes32,bytes32,uint256) |
0xd671da21 | eventCount(bytes32) |
0xf76378f8 | eventCountByType(bytes32,bytes32) |
0xed098a5b | getEvent(bytes32,uint256) |
0x80c7f3b7 | isEventCurrent(bytes32,uint256) |
0x6ebf84b9 | lastRecordedEventByType(bytes32,bytes32) |
0x0c9b00cb | recordEvent(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,(address,bytes32)[],bytes32,string,bytes32,bytes,bytes32,uint64,uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-8328