ERC-165 vs ERC-8327
Standard Interface Detection compared with Directional Transfer Domain Registry.
No shared functions
0 shared · 1 vs 9 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-8327 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-165 (1)
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
▶️ Only in ERC-8327 (9)
0xa0e65839 | cancelRevocation(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0xdf9a2bbe | finalizeRevocation(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0xfcbddce7 | getRevocation(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0xbe3a96ec | getRoute(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0x130464a4 | initiateRevocation(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0x29a154be | isRoutePermitted(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0xf1a5e959 | isRoutePermittedBatch(bytes32[],bytes32[],bytes32[]) |
0x2929da83 | revokeRoute(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
0x8771e270 | setRoute(bytes32,bytes32,bytes32,bytes32) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-8327