ERC-165 vs ERC-5982

Standard Interface Detection compared with Role-based Access Control.

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 15 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-5982 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

`0xb7416cce`	`canExecute(bytes32,bytes4,bytes32,bytes)`
`0xc7072a8f`	`canGrantRole(bytes32,bytes32,bytes)`
`0x7712f836`	`canRevokeRole(bytes32,bytes32,address,bytes)`
`0xa9a61cbe`	`createRole(bytes32,bytes32,string,string,string,bytes32)`
`0x3f5fe075`	`destroyRole(bytes32,bytes32)`
`0xf4f5eb5d`	`grantRole(bytes32,address,bytes)`
`0x2f2ff15d`	`grantRole(bytes32,address)`
`0xf5d5408b`	`hasRole(bytes32,address,bytes)`
`0x91d14854`	`hasRole(bytes32,address)`
`0x3f038cc7`	`revokeRole(bytes32,address,bytes)`
`0xd547741f`	`revokeRole(bytes32,address)`
`0x0aa6affe`	`roleDescription(bytes32)`
`0xf5ef8476`	`roleName(bytes32)`
`0x9eb6a9ef`	`roleURI(bytes32)`
`0x321de094`	`setRolePower(bytes32,bytes4,bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-5982