ERC-165 vs ERC-5679

Standard Interface Detection compared with Token Minting and Burning.

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 7 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-5679 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

`0x44d17187`	`burn(address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x3fdaf33b`	`burn(address,uint256,uint256,bytes[])`
`0x5473422e`	`burnBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0x94d008ef`	`mint(address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x8832e6e3`	`safeMint(address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x5cfa9297`	`safeMint(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xc39dfed8`	`safeMintBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-5679