ERC-165 vs ERC-4910
Standard Interface Detection compared with Royalty Bearing NFTs.
No shared functions
0 shared · 1 vs 9 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-4910 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-165 (1)
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
▶️ Only in ERC-4910 (9)
0xbad76677 | _royaltyPayOut(uint256,address,address,uint256) |
0x004699d0 | deleteRoyaltyAccount(uint256) |
0xbc50ef86 | distributePayment(uint256,uint265) |
0xfc09c55c | getRoyaltyAccount(uint256) |
0xc9488cd3 | listNFT(uint256[],uint256,address) |
0xb2230b7e | removeNFTListing(uint256) |
0xb376f046 | reversePayment(uint256,string) |
0x9e51fd42 | royaltyPayOut(uint256,address,address,uint256) |
0xb88d4fde | safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-4910