ERC-165 vs ERC-4393
Standard Interface Detection compared with Micropayments for NFTs and Multi Tokens.
No shared functions
0 shared · 1 vs 9 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
ERC-4393 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-165 (1)
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
▶️ Only in ERC-4393 (9)
0x12c81d4f | balanceDepositOf(address) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x47e7ef24 | deposit(address,uint256) |
0x12425d4e | isApprovalForNFT(address,address,uint256) |
0x65fd0794 | rewardPendingOf(address) |
0xbe3f51bb | setApprovalForNFT(address[],address,uint256,bool) |
0xb7577fbe | tip(address,uint256,uint256) |
0xed184baf | tipBatch(address[],address[],uint256[],uint256[]) |
0x523a3f08 | withdrawReward(uint256) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-4393