ERC-165 vs ERC-1261

Standard Interface Detection compared with Membership Verification Token (MVT).

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 15 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-1261 lists ERC-165 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x01ffc9a7 supportsInterface(bytes4)

`0x00c6abf9`	`addAttributeSet(bytes32,bytes32[])`
`0x061dff9a`	`approveRequest(address)`
`0x15bc9406`	`assignTo(address,uint256[])`
`0x6112e48f`	`discardRequest(address)`
`0xa324a9cf`	`forfeitMembership()`
`0x7c0f6b35`	`getAllMembers()`
`0x04c017c9`	`getAttributeByIndex(address,uint256)`
`0xf0e72756`	`getAttributeExhaustiveCollection(bytes32)`
`0x4e6762fa`	`getAttributeNames()`
`0x446d5aa4`	`getAttributes(address)`
`0xcb695ef4`	`getCurrentMemberCount()`
`0xae6b1143`	`isCurrentMember(address)`
`0x7851c0ed`	`modifyAttributeByIndex(address,uint256,uint256)`
`0x7ec92e59`	`requestMembership(uint256[])`
`0xc89ed7aa`	`revokeFrom(address)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-165 · ERC-1261