ERC-137 vs ERC-2304
Ethereum Domain Name Service - Specification compared with Multichain address resolution for ENS.
Overlapping, neither contains the other
3 shared · 15 vs 5 functions · 60% of the smaller surface
ERC-2304 lists ERC-137 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.
🤝 Shared (3)
0x3b3b57de | addr(bytes32) |
0xd5fa2b00 | setAddr(bytes32,address) |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
◀️ Only in ERC-137 (12)
0x19a17468 | ENS(address) |
0x9d063ed8 | FIFSRegistrar(address,bytes32) |
0x02571be3 | owner(bytes32) |
0xebb045fa | PublicResolver(address) |
0xd22057a9 | register(bytes32,address) |
0x659755f9 | Resolver() |
0x0178b8bf | resolver(bytes32) |
0x5b0fc9c3 | setOwner(bytes32,address) |
0x1896f70a | setResolver(bytes32,address) |
0x06ab5923 | setSubnodeOwner(bytes32,bytes32,address) |
0x14ab9038 | setTTL(bytes32,uint64) |
0x16a25cbd | ttl(bytes32) |
▶️ Only in ERC-2304 (2)
0xf1cb7e06 | addr(bytes32,uint256) |
0x8b95dd71 | setAddr(bytes32,uint256,bytes) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-137 · ERC-2304