ERC-1363 vs ERC-2612
Payable Token compared with Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals.
No shared functions
0 shared · 16 vs 3 functions · 0% of the smaller surface
🤝 Shared (0)
None.
◀️ Only in ERC-1363 (16)
0xdd62ed3e | allowance(address,address) |
0x095ea7b3 | approve(address,uint256) |
0xcae9ca51 | approveAndCall(address,uint256,bytes) |
0x3177029f | approveAndCall(address,uint256) |
0x70a08231 | balanceOf(address) |
0x313ce567 | decimals() |
0x06fdde03 | name() |
0x01ffc9a7 | supportsInterface(bytes4) |
0x95d89b41 | symbol() |
0x18160ddd | totalSupply() |
0xa9059cbb | transfer(address,uint256) |
0x4000aea0 | transferAndCall(address,uint256,bytes) |
0x1296ee62 | transferAndCall(address,uint256) |
0x23b872dd | transferFrom(address,address,uint256) |
0xc1d34b89 | transferFromAndCall(address,address,uint256,bytes) |
0xd8fbe994 | transferFromAndCall(address,address,uint256) |
▶️ Only in ERC-2612 (3)
0x3644e515 | DOMAIN_SEPARATOR() |
0x7ecebe00 | nonces(address) |
0xd505accf | permit(address,address,uint256,uint256,uint8,bytes32,bytes32) |
Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1363 · ERC-2612