ERC-1271 vs ERC-8226

Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts compared with Regulated Agent Mandate.

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 22 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8226 lists ERC-1271 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x1626ba7e isValidSignature(bytes32,bytes)

`0xf80ba00f`	`canExecute(address,address,address,bytes32,uint256)`
`0x01003112`	`checkPrincipal(address,bytes32)`
`0x3644e515`	`DOMAIN_SEPARATOR()`
`0x1cff79cd`	`execute(address,bytes)`
`0x98d22b55`	`extendMandate(address,address,uint48,uint256,bytes)`
`0x267fbac5`	`freezeAgent(address)`
`0x448c857e`	`freezePrincipal(address)`
`0xc5e98345`	`getMandate(address,address)`
`0xc6a4ad00`	`grantMandate((address,uint48,uint48,address,address,bytes32,address,uint256,uint256,bytes32,bytes32[],uint256),bytes)`
`0xdbca38d3`	`grantPrincipal(address,bytes32,uint48)`
`0x0c53b010`	`isActionEnabled(address,address,bytes32)`
`0x983ea7da`	`isAgentFrozen(address)`
`0xb6363cf2`	`isOperator(address,address)`
`0x1687a2d6`	`isPrincipalFrozen(address)`
`0x7ecebe00`	`nonces(address)`
`0xb48faccf`	`recordExecution(address,address,bytes32,uint256)`
`0x5e20639e`	`revokeMandate(address,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x20e03072`	`revokePrincipal(address,uint8)`
`0x5e6f170b`	`setOperator(address,address,bool,uint256,bytes)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0xa2e97ab4`	`unfreezeAgent(address)`
`0x18ed4b06`	`unfreezePrincipal(address)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1271 · ERC-8226