ERC-1271 vs ERC-6900

Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts compared with Modular Smart Contract Accounts.

No shared functions

0 shared · 1 vs 18 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-6900 lists ERC-1271 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

0x1626ba7e isValidSignature(bytes32,bytes)

`0x9cfd7cff`	`accountId()`
`0xb61d27f6`	`execute(address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x34fcd5be`	`executeBatch((address,uint256,bytes)[])`
`0xf2680c0f`	`executeWithRuntimeValidation(bytes,bytes)`
`0xae5628c6`	`executionManifest()`
`0x757c8a26`	`getExecutionData(bytes4)`
`0xab9c1785`	`installValidation((bytes25),bytes4[],bytes,bytes[])`
`0xa1308f27`	`moduleId()`
`0x6d61fe70`	`onInstall(bytes)`
`0x8a91b0e3`	`onUninstall(bytes)`
`0x5d413a81`	`postExecutionHook(uint32,bytes)`
`0xed6dfb13`	`preExecutionHook(uint32,address,uint256,bytes)`
`0x3d6bda32`	`preRuntimeValidationHook(uint32,address,uint256,bytes,bytes)`
`0x3f41826e`	`preSignatureValidationHook(uint32,address,bytes32,bytes)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`
`0xbb422bc7`	`uninstallValidation((bytes24),bytes,bytes[])`
`0x465d33e0`	`validateRuntime(address,uint32,address,uint256,bytes,bytes)`
`0xe7db7f7e`	`validateSignature(address,uint32,address,bytes32,bytes)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1271 · ERC-6900