ERC-1155 vs ERC-8040

Multi Token Standard compared with ESG Tokenization Protocol.

No shared functions

0 shared · 7 vs 5 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-8040 lists ERC-1155 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x00fdd58e`	`balanceOf(address,uint256)`
`0x4e1273f4`	`balanceOfBatch(address[],uint256[])`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x2eb2c2d6`	`safeBatchTransferFrom(address,address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf242432a`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`

`0xb2b3fa5f`	`auditESGToken(uint256,bytes)`
`0x55c68702`	`esgURI(uint256)`
`0xa574cea4`	`getMetadata(uint256)`
`0x06e58822`	`mintESGToken((string,string,string,uint256,string,bytes,string,(bytes,string),string,string))`
`0x09eba508`	`retireESGToken(uint256,string)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1155 · ERC-8040