ERC-1155 vs ERC-7390

Multi Token Standard compared with Vanilla Options for ERC-20 Tokens.

No shared functions

0 shared · 7 vs 8 functions · 0% of the smaller surface

ERC-7390 lists ERC-1155 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (0)

None.

`0x00fdd58e`	`balanceOf(address,uint256)`
`0x4e1273f4`	`balanceOfBatch(address[],uint256[])`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0x2eb2c2d6`	`safeBatchTransferFrom(address,address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf242432a`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`

`0xd6febde8`	`buy(uint256,uint256)`
`0x57d682c4`	`cancel(uint256,address)`
`0x4b849905`	`create((uint8,address,uint256,address,uint256,address,uint256,uint256,uint256,address[]))`
`0xa86265bb`	`exercise(uint256,uint256)`
`0x248b761e`	`issuance(uint256)`
`0xbe74c737`	`retrieveExpiredTokens(uint256,address)`
`0x86d1743f`	`updateAllowed(uint256,address[])`
`0xdb191d5d`	`updatePremium(uint256,uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1155 · ERC-7390