ERC-1155 vs ERC-7291

Multi Token Standard compared with Purpose bound money.

Overlapping, neither contains the other

3 shared · 7 vs 17 functions · 43% of the smaller surface

ERC-7291 lists ERC-1155 in its requires field but declares no inheritance in its interface, so any surface it inherits is not counted here.

🤝 Shared (3)

`0x2eb2c2d6`	`safeBatchTransferFrom(address,address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf242432a`	`safeTransferFrom(address,address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0x01ffc9a7`	`supportsInterface(bytes4)`

`0x00fdd58e`	`balanceOf(address,uint256)`
`0x4e1273f4`	`balanceOfBatch(address[],uint256[])`
`0xe985e9c5`	`isApprovedForAll(address,address)`
`0xa22cb465`	`setApprovalForAll(address,bool)`

`0x8a94b05f`	`burn(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0x5473422e`	`burnBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0x07e82e0f`	`initialise(address,uint256,address)`
`0xfe575a87`	`isBlacklisted(address)`
`0x1a2f7167`	`isMerchant(address)`
`0x99d548aa`	`load(uint256)`
`0x8da5cb5b`	`owner()`
`0x73e17e76`	`revokePBM(uint256)`
`0x5cfa9297`	`safeMint(address,uint256,uint256,bytes)`
`0xc39dfed8`	`safeMintBatch(address,uint256[],uint256[],bytes)`
`0xf2fde38b`	`transferOwnership(address)`
`0x935a8b84`	`underlyingBalanceOf(address)`
`0xdc7956f0`	`unload(uint256)`
`0x0e89341c`	`uri(uint256)`

Both surfaces parsed from the canonical specifications: ERC-1155 · ERC-7291